Main Page

encyclopedia.codeboy.net

 

Reverse Polish notation

Reverse Polish notation (RPN) , also known as postfix notation, is an arithmetic formula notation, derived from the polish notation introduced in 1920 by the Polish mathematician Jan Łukasiewicz. RPN was invented by Australian philosopher and computer scientist Charles Hamblin in the mid-1950s, to enable zero-address memory stores. As a user interface for calculation the notation was first used in Hewlett-Packard's desktop calculators from the late 1960s and then in the HP-35 handheld scientific calculator launched in 1972. In RPN the operands precede the operator, thus dispensing with the need for parentheses. For example, the expression 3 * ( 4 + 7) would be written as 3 4 7 + *, and done on an RPN calculator as "3", "Enter", "4", "Enter", "7", "+", "*". Implementations of RPN are stack-based; that is, operands are popped from a stack, and calculation results are pushed back onto it. Although this concept may seem obscure at first, RPN has the advantage of being extremely easy, and therefore fast, for a computer to analyze due to it being a regular grammar.

Table of contents
1 Practical implications
2 Example
3 Converting from Infix Notation
4 Real-world RPN use
5 See also
6 References

Practical implications

  • Calculations proceed from left to right\n* There are no brackets or parentheses, as they are unnecessary.\n* Operands precede operator. They are removed as the operation is evaluated.\n* When an operation is made, the result becomes an operand itself (for later operators)\n* There is no hidden state. No need to wonder if you hit an operator or not.

Example

The calculation: ((1 + 2) * 4) + 3 can be written down like this in RPN:\n 1 2 + 4 * 3 +\nThe expression is evaluated in the following way (the Stack is displayed after Operation has taken place): \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Input Stack Operation
1 1 Push operand
2 1, 2 Push operand
+ 3 Addition
4 3, 4 Push operand
* 12 Multiplication
3 12, 3 Push operand
+ 15 Addition
The final result, 15, lies on the top of the stack in the end of the calculation. An alternate way of viewing the stack during the above operation is \nshow below (as seen on HP48S calculator).\n
\n +---------------+\n +               +\n +               +\n +             1 +  [1] [enter]\n +---------------+
+---------------+\n +               +\n +             1 +\n +             2 +  [2] [enter]\n +---------------+
+---------------+\n +               +\n +               +\n +             3 +  [+] \n +---------------+
+---------------+\n +               +\n +             3 +\n +             4 +  [4] [enter]\n +---------------+
+---------------+\n +               +\n +               +\n +            12 +  [*] \n +---------------+
+---------------+\n +               +\n +            12 +\n +             3 +  [3] [enter]\n +---------------+
\n +---------------+\n + +\n + +\n + 15 + [+] \n +---------------+\n

Converting from Infix Notation

Like the evaluation of RPN, conversion from
Infix notation to RPN is stack-based. Infix expressions are the form of math most people are used to, for instance 3+4 or 3+4*(2-1). For the conversion there are 2 text Variables (Strings), the input and the output. There is also a stack holding operators not yet added to the output stack. To convert, the program reads each letter in order and does something based on that letter.

A simplistic conversion

Input: 3+4\n #Add 3 to the output stack (whenever a number is read it is added to the output)\n #Add 4 to the output stack\n #Push + (or it's ID) onto the operator stack\n #After reading expression pop the operators off the stack and add them to the output. In this case there is only one, "+".\n #Output 3 4 +
This already shows a couple of rules:\n* All numbers are added to the output when they are read.\n* At the end of reading the expression, pop all operators off the stack and onto the output.

The algorithm in detail

Complex example

Input 3+4*2/(1-5)^2\n Read "3"\n  Add "3" to the output\n   Output: 3\n Read "+"\n  Push "+" onto the stack\n   Output: 3\n   Stack: +\n Read "4"\n  Add "4" to the output\n   Output: 3 4\n   Stack: +\n Read "*"\n  Push "*" onto the stack\n   Output: 3 4\n   Stack: + *\n Read "2"\n  Add "2" to the output\n   Output: 3 4 2\n   Stack: + *\n Read "/"\n  Pop "*" off stack and add it to output, push "/" onto the stack\n   Output: 3 4 2 *\n   Stack: + /\n Read "("\n  Push "(" onto the stack\n   Output: 3 4 2 *\n   Stack: + / (\n Read "1"\n  Add "1" to output\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1\n   Stack: + / (\n Read "-"\n  Push "-" onto the stack\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1\n   Stack: + / ( -\n Read "5"\n  Add "5" to output\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1 5\n   Stack: + / ( -\n Read ")"\n  Pop "-" off stack and add it to the output, pop (\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1 5 -\n   Stack: + /\n Read "^"\n  Push "^" onto stack\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1 5 -\n   Stack: + / ^\n Read "2"\n  Add "2" to output\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1 5 - 2\n   Stack: + / ^\n End of Expression\n  Pop stack to output\n   Output: 3 4 2 * 1 5 - 2 ^ / +
If you were writing an
interpreter, this output would be tokenized and written to a compiled file to be later interpreted. Conversion from Infix to RPN can also allow for easier computer simplification of expressions. To do this, act like you are solving the RPN expression, however, whenever you come to a variable its value is null, and whenever an operator has a null value, it and its parameters are written to the output (this is a simplification, problems arise when the parameters are operators). When an operator has no null parameters its value can simply be written to the output. This method obviously doesn't include all the simplifications possible.

Real-world RPN use

See also

References

Category:Calculators \n\n

"There's many a bestseller that could have been prevented by a good teacher." - Flannery O'Connor (1925-1964)