Richter magnitude scale
The
Richter magnitude scale is a mathematical technique used to quantify the size of
earthquakes.
Developed in
1935 by
Charles Richter in collaboration with
Beno Gutenberg, both of the
California Institute of Technology, the Richter scale assigns a single number to quantify the size of an earthquake. It is more correctly called the M
L Scale (for
local magnitude).\nRichter's local magnitude scale was originally intended to be used only in a particular study area in California, and on seismograms recorded on a particular instrument, the Wood-Anderson torsion
seismometer.
Richter magnitude is a
logarithmic scale obtained by calculating the logarithm of the combined horizontal
amplitude of the largest displacement from zero on a
seismogram. The diminution of amplitude due to distance between the earthquake
epicenter and the seismometer is corrected for by subtracting the logarithm of the expected amplitude of a magnitude 0 event at that distance. This correction for distance is intended to make the local magnitude an absolute measure of earthquake size. Richter originally reported values to the nearest quarter of a unit but later, decimal numbers were used.
Richter's motivation for creating the local magnitude scale was to separate the vastly larger number of smaller earthquakes from the relatively fewer larger earthquakes observed in California at the time.\nHis inspiration for the technique was the
stellar magnitude scale used in
astronomy to describe the brightness of stars and other celestial objects.
Richter arbitrarily chose a magnitude 0 event to be an earthquake that would show a maximum combined horizontal displacement of 1 micrometre on a seismogram recorded using a Wood-Anderson torsion seismometer located 100 km from the earthquake epicenter. This choice was made to prevent negative magnitudes\nfrom being assigned.\nHowever, the Richter scale has no upper or lower limit. Sensitive modern seismographs now routinely record quakes with negative magnitudes.
Because of the limitations of the Wood-Anderson torsion seismometer used to develop the scale, the original M
L cannot be calculated for events larger than about 6.8. Many investigators have proposed extensions to the local magnitude scale, the most popular being the
surface wave magnitude M
S and the body wave magnitude M
b.
The major problem with Richter magnitude is that it is not easily related to physical characteristics of the earthquake source. Furthermore, there is a saturation effect at near 8.3-8.5, owing to the scaling law of earthquake spectra, that causes traditional magnitude methods (such as M
S)\nto yield the same magnitude estimate for events that are clearly of different size.\nBy the beginning of the
21st century, most seismologists considered the traditional magnitude scales to be largely obsolete, being replaced by a more physically meaningful measurement called the
seismic moment which is more directly relatable to the physical parameters, such as the dimension of the
earthquake rupture, and the energy released from the earthquake.\nIn
1979 seismologist
Hiroo Kanamori, also of the
California Institute of Technology, proposed the
Moment Magnitude Scale (M
W), which provides a way of expressing seismic moments in a form that can be approximately related to traditional seismic magnitude measurements.
Magnitude must not be confused with
intensity.\nIntensity scales, such as the Rossi-Forel and Modified
Mercalli Intensity Scale, are used to describe relative earthquake effects. Intensity is sensitive to a host of local site conditions and is not an absolute measurements of earthquake size.
Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater are strong enough to be recorded by seismographs all over the world.
\n\n| Descriptor | Richter Magnitudes | \nEarthquake Effects | \nAverage Annually | \n
\n\n| Micro | Less than 2.0 | \nMicroearthquakes, not felt. | \nAbout 8,000 per day | \n
\n\n| Very minor | 2.0-2.9 | \nGenerally not felt, but recorded. | \nAbout 1,000 per day | \n
\n\n| Minor | 3.0-3.9 | \nOften felt, but rarely causes damage. | \n49,000 (estimated) | \n
\n\n| Light | 4.0-4.9 | \nNoticeable shaking of indoor items, rattling noises. Significant damage unlikely. | \n6,200 (estimated) | \n
\n\n| Moderate | 5.0-5.9 | \nCan cause major damage to poorly constructed buildings over small regions. At most slight damage to well-designed buildings. | \n800 | \n
\n\n| Strong | 6.0-6.9 | \nCan be destructive in areas up to about 100 miles across in populated areas. | \n120 | \n
\n\n| Major | 7.0-7.9 | \nCan cause serious damage over larger areas. | \n18 | \n
\n\n| Great | 8.0 or greater | \nCan cause serious damage in areas several hundred miles across. | \n1 | \n
\n
\n(
Adapted from U.S. Geological Survey documents.)
Great earthquakes occur once a year, on average. The largest recorded earthquake was
Great Chilean Earthquake of
May 22,
1960 which had a magnitude (M
W) of 9.5 (
Chile 1960). The largest earthquake to occur in the U.S. was the
Good Friday Earthquake of South-central
Alaska of
March 28,
1964, moment magnitude 9.2 (
Alaska 1964).
- See also: List of earthquakes
Category:Seismology\n simple:Richter scale\nCategory:Scales