Main Page

encyclopedia.codeboy.net

 

Roman numeral

The system of Roman numerals is a numeral system originating in ancient Rome. It is based on certain letters which are given values: The early Romans used the above letters, but for multiples of thousands above 4 used combinations of I and a reversed C symbol. Later Romans used a horizontal line above a particular numeral to represent one thousand times that numeral, and additional vertical lines on either side of the numeral to denote one hundred times the number, as in these examples:
\n_           _            _                 _\nI for 1000  V for 5000  |I| for 100 000   |V| for 500 000\n
The same overline was also used with a different meaning, to clarify that the letters were numbers. When describing members of a list, first A, B, C, D tended to be used, then 1, 2, 3 then i, ii, iii, iv. Throughout the centuries, there has been variation in some of its symbols — specifically, the subtractive notation (which uses, e.g., IV instead of IIII to denote 4) has entered universal use only in modern times. For example, Forme of Cury, a manuscript from 1390, uses IX for 9, but IIII for 4. Another document in the same manuscript, from 1381, uses IV and IX. A third document in the same manuscript uses IIII, IV, and IX. The Romans themselves didn't seem to bother that much about what was the correct formation of a number; constructions such as IIX for eight have been discovered. In many cases, there seems to have been a certain reluctance in the use of subtractive notation. Some rules regarding Roman numerals state that a symbol representing 10x may not precede any symbol larger than 10x+1; use XCIX not IC for 99. However, these rules are not set in stone. Clock faces typically show IIII for 4 o'clock and IX for 9 o'clock — using the subtractive principle in one case and not in the other. There are several suggested reasons for this:\n* It has been said that the reason 4 o'clock is IIII (and not IV), is because IV is the first two letters of IVPITER, the supreme god of the Romans.\n* The total number of symbols on the clock totals 20 I's, four V's and four X's; so clock makers only need a mould with five I's, a V and an X, in order to make the correct number of numerals for the clocks.\n* IV is difficult to read up-side down and on an angle, particularly at the location on the clock.\n* A particular Roman ruler had a clock manufactured incorrectly (with IIII) and others started making their clocks that way in order not to offend him.\n* Louis XIV, king of France, preferred IIII over IV, ordered his clockmakers to produce clocks with IIII and not IV, and thus it has remained. Roman numerals remained in common use until about the 14th century, when they were replaced by Arabic numerals (thought to have been introduced to Europe by Arab traders around the 11th century). The use of Roman numerals today is mostly restricted to ordinal numbers, such as volumes or chapters in a book or the numbers identifying monarchs (e.g. Elizabeth II). The BBC uses them to denote the year in which a television program was made (the ABC has largely stopped this practice but still occasionally lapses). Sometimes they are written using lower-case letters (thus: i, ii, iii, iv, etc.), particularly if numbering paragraphs or sections within chapters. Undergraduate degrees at British universities are generally graded using I, IIi, IIii, III for first, upper second, lower second and third class respectively. Roman numerals are today still used on building faces for dates: 2004 can be represented as MMIV. Due to the use of alphabetic symbols in Roman numerals, the Roman system could also be used to write chronograms, sentences or inscriptions in which the capital letters stand for a particular date. The "modern" Roman numerals, post-Victorian era, are shown below: \n\n
RomanArabicNotes
none0There was no need for a zero.\n
I1\n
II2\n
III3\n
IV4IIII is still used on clock and card faces.\n
V5\n
VI6\n
VII7\n
VIII8\n
IX9\n
X10\n
XI11\n
XII12\n
XIII13\n
XIV14\n
XV15\n
XIX19\n
XX20\n
XXX30\n
XL40\n
L50\n
LX60\n
LXX70The abbreviation for the Septuagint\n
LXXX80\n
XC90\n
C100This is the origin of using the slang term "C-bill" or "C-note" for "$100 bill".\n
CC200\n
CD400\n
D500\n
CM900\n
M1000\n
ⅭⅠↃ or ↀ1000Conjoined C, I and reversed C, alternative to M.\n
1000A glyph similar to the Infinity sign, alternative to M.\n
MCMXLV1945\n
MCMXCIX1999Note that officially there are no short cuts, and the I can only precede V or X.\n
MM2000\n
MMM3000\n
ⅠↃↃ or ↁ5000I followed by two reversed C, an adapted Chalcidic sign\n
ⅭⅭⅠↃↃ or ↂ10000CCI, then two reversed C\n
Reversed 100Reversed C, used in combination with C and I to form large numbers.\n
An accurate way to write large numbers in Roman numerals is to handle first the thousands, then hundreds, then tens, then units.\n
Example: the number 1988.\n
One thousand is M, nine hundred is CM, eighty is LXXX, eight is VIII. \n
Put it together: MCMLXXXVIII. The "shortcut method" for large numbers such as 1998 is not recommended, but still used:\n
1998\n
Two thousand is M, so subtract two (II) and you have 1998\n
MIIM or IIMM. Unicode has a number of characters specifically designated as Roman numerals, as part of the Number Forms range from U+2160 to U+2183. This range includes both upper- and lowercase numerals, as well as pre-combined glyphs for numbers up to 12 (Ⅻ or XII), mainly intended for the clock faces for compatibility with non–West-European languages. These special characters should be used rather than the letters whenever possible, to avoid confusion. For example, MCMLXXXVIII could alternatively be written as \nⅯⅭⅯⅬⅩⅩⅩⅧ or ⅯⅭⅯⅬⅩⅩⅩⅤⅠⅠⅠ (preferred). Of course displaying these characters requires a font, such as Arial Unicode MS, that contains the necessary characters.

Games

\nDuring the
Renaissance, it was common to put in the first page of a book some Latin phrase, so that when adding the I, V, X, L, C, D, M present in the phrase, the reader would obtain a number, usually the year of publication.

External link

\n*
FAQ: Roman IIII vs. IV on Clock Dials Category:Ancient Rome \n\n

"Now, now my good man, this is no time for making enemies." - Voltaire (1694-1778) on his deathbed in response to a priest asking that he renounce Satan.