Secret Gospel of Mark

The discovery in 1958 of a fragment of an unknown Secret Gospel of Mark provoked a storm of recrimination, denial and abuse. The Secret Gospel of Mark was quoted in a previously unknown letter of Clement of Alexandria, which had been transcribed into the endpapers of a 17th century printed book in the monastery of Mar Saba, twelve miles south of Jerusalem. The letter is consequently often called the "Mar Saba letter". Starting with the Dead Sea Scrolls, textual discoveries in the later 20th century revealed a new understanding of the broadly divergent oral traditions and parallel texts of the Hebrew Bible, and the variety of interpretations that could be drawn from the sayings and life of Jesus of Nazareth. New texts revealed the extent of editing, suppression, omissions and interpolations that went into the process of reaching the canonic New Testament that has survived and which we all know. The letter was written by Clement to a follower named Theodore. The letter, for instance, shed light on Clement's views on justifiable means of opposing error (in this case of a minor sect, followers of a certain Carpocrates):\n:"Such men are to be opposed in all ways and altogether. For, even if they should say something true, one who loves the truth should not, even so, agree with them. For not all true things are the truth, nor should that truth which merely seems true according to human opinions be preferred to the true truth, that according to the faith." A justification for an ad hominem argument, for not all true things are the truth. But such techniques of achieving orthodoxy were familiar and raised no hackles in the 20th century readers who were seeing this letter for the first time. The leader of this sect, however, had procured a copy of a work by Mark the Evangelist that was being very carefully guarded in Alexandria. It is significant that Clement attributes the uses being made of Secret Mark to Carpocrates, who was born a century earlier. Clement must have believed that Secret Mark existed before ca 125 CE. How it got to Alexandria, Clement reports to his correspondent, referring to the Secret Gospel:

"As for Mark, then, during Peter's stay in Rome he wrote an account of the Lord's doings, not, however, declaring all of them, nor yet hinting at the secret ones, but selecting what he thought most useful for increasing the faith of those who were being instructed. But when Peter died a martyr, Mark came over to Alexandria, bringing both his own notes and those of Peter, from which he transferred to his former book the things suitable to whatever makes for progress toward knowledge. Thus he composed a more spiritual Gospel for the use of those who were being perfected. Nevertheless, he yet did not divulge the things not to be uttered, nor did he write down the hierophantic teaching of the Lord, but to the stories already written he added yet others and, moreover, brought in certain sayings of which he knew the interpretation would, as a mystagogue, lead the hearers into the innermost sanctuary of that truth hidden by seven veils. Thus, in sum, he prepared matters, neither grudgingly nor incautiously, in my opinion, and, dying, he left his composition to the church in Alexandria, where it even yet is most carefully guarded, being read only to those who are being initiated into the great mysteries"

In response to his correspondent, Theodore, Clement quotes two sections which he claims have been distorted by the heretics. The brief excerpt from the Secret Gospel of Mark quoted by Clement raised a storm of controversy:

"And they come into Bethany. And a certain woman whose brother had died was there. And, coming, she prostrated herself before Jesus and says to him, 'Son of David, have mercy on me.' But the disciples rebuked her. And Jesus, being angered, went off with her into the garden where the tomb was, and straightway a great cry was heard from the tomb. And going near Jesus rolled away the stone from the door of the tomb. And straightway, going in where the youth was, he stretched forth his hand and raised him, seizing his hand. But the youth, looking upon him, loved him and began to beseech him that he might be with him. And going out of the tomb they came into the house of the youth, for he was rich. And after six days Jesus told him what to do and in the evening the youth comes to him, wearing a linen cloth over his naked body. And he remained with him that night, for Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God. And thence, arising, he returned to the other side of the Jordan."

According to Clement, this episode would have been deleted from between Mark 10:34 and 35. A second fragment of Secret Mark was deleted from Mark 10:46. This has long been recognized as a narrative discontinuity in Mark's Gospel, as in the accepted canon it awkwardly reads, "Then they come to Jericho. As he was leaving Jericho with his disciples..." That some text is missing can scarcely be a subject for controversy. Secret Mark reads:\n:"Then he came into Jericho. And the sister of the young man whom Jesus loved was there with his mother and Salome, but Jesus would not receive them. As he was leaving Jericho with his disciples..." The statement "Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God" has been interpreted as a reference to the rites of baptism. The idea that Jesus practised baptism is absent from the synoptic gospels, though it is introduced in the Gospel of John. Several further echoes of Secret Mark are identifiable in the canonic Mark, according to textual analysts. The canonic Gospel of Mark exists in manuscripts with nine different endings. A discussion of these endings and the canonically preferred short ending at Mark 16:8 can be found at the entry Gospel of Mark Apologists claim the abbreviated ending also to be the earliest one from the lack of references in Patristic writers and by analyzing surviving texts. Those who wish to find a late date for Secret Mark sometimes even suggest that the shortest version of a story is usually the earliest. They offer examples such as the Book of Enoch, which retells Genesis in an elaborately detailed and expanded later rewriting. The reader will quickly comprehend the difference between a story and its expanded retelling, and a manuscript which suffers losses or gains interpolations. Rather than dismiss this newly-attested miracle as mythology, Smith asked to what degree the miracle stories of the gospels might in fact be based upon actions of Jesus.

External link

\n*Secret Gospel of Mark homepage\n*Early Christian Writings website: Secret Gospel of Mark\n*The Whole Bible website: Secret Gospel of Mark\n*Miles Fowler, "Identification of the Bethany Youth in the Secret Gospel of Mark with other Figures Found in Mark and John" proposes that some late-1st-century Christians understood that up to five seemingly separate youths now found in Mark, Secret Mark, and John, were identical.\n*The controversy: permitted 1500 words to answer a 20-page article in the Catholic Biblical Quarterly Morton Smith ably defended his discovery (April 1976)\n*Shawn Eyer, "The Strange Case of the Secret Gospel According to Mark: How Morton Smith's Discovery of a Lost Letter by Clement of Alexandria Scandalized Biblical Scholarship": scholarly and popular response to the discovery

Reference

Morton Smith, Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark Harvard University Press, 1973 (the scholarly version)\nMorton Smith, The Secret Gospel: The Discovery and Interpretation of the Secret Gospel According to Mark, 1981 (the popular version)