U.S. presidential election, 2000
The election for
President of the United States in
2000 was one of the closest elections in the history of the
United States, contested primarily by then
Governor of Texas George W. Bush (
Republican), and then
Vice President Al Gore (
Democrat).
\n
Introduction and summary results
\n\n| Presidential Candidate | Electoral Vote | \nPopular Vote | \nPct | \nParty\n | Running Mate
(Electoral Votes) | \n
\n\n| George Walker Bush of Texas (W) | \n271 | \n50,456,002 | \n47.87 | \nRepublican | \nRichard Bruce Cheney of Wyoming (271) | \n
\n\n| Albert Arnold Gore, Jr of Tennessee | \n266 | \n50,999,897 | \n48.38 | \nDemocrat | \nJoseph Isadore Lieberman of Connecticut (266) | \n
\n\n| Ralph Nader of Connecticut | \n0 | \n2,882,955 | \n2.74 | \nGreen | \nWinona LaDuke of Minnesota (0) | \n
\n\n| Patrick J. Buchanan of Virginia | \n0 | \n448,895 | \n0.42 | \nReform | \nEzola Foster of California (0) | \n
\n\n| Harry Browne of Tennessee | \n0 | \n384,431 | \n0.36 | \nLibertarian | \nArt Olivier of California (0) | \n
\n\n| Howard Phillips of Virginia | \n0 | \n98,020 | \n0.09 | \nConstitution | \nJ. Curtis Frazier of Missouri (0) | \n
\n\n| John Hagelin of Iowa | \n0 | \n83,714 | \n0.08 | \nNatural Law/Reform | \nNat Goldhaber of California (0) | \n
\n\n| Other | \n0 | \n51,186 | \n0.05 | \n | \n
\n| No electoral vote cast (DC: see below) | \n1 | \n | \n | \n | \n
\n| Total | \n538 | \n105,405,100 | \n100.00 | \n | \n
\n| Detailed results by state: see U.S. presidential election, 2000 (detail) |
\n| Other elections: 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012 |
\n| Sources: U.S. Office of the Federal Register (electoral vote), Federal Election Commission (popular vote) |
|---|
The election took over a month to resolve, highlighted by two premature declarations of a "winner" on election night and an extremely close result in the state of
Florida. Florida's 25 electoral votes ultimately decided the election by a razor thin margin of actual votes, and was certified only after numerous court challenges and recounts. Al Gore publicly conceded the election after the Supreme Court, in the case
Bush v. Gore, voted 7-2 to declare the recount procedure in process unconstitutional because it was not being carried out statewide and 5-4 to ban further recounts using other procedures. Gore strongly disagreed with the court's decision, but decided that "
for the sake of our unity of the people and the strength of our democracy, I offer my concession." He had previously made a concession phone call to Bush the night of the election, but quickly retracted it after learning just how close the election was. Following the election, a subsequent recount conducted by various U.S. news media organizations indicated that Bush would have won using some of the recount methods (including the one favored by Gore at the time of the Supreme Court decision) but that Gore would have won if other methods were adopted.
The Florida election has been closely scrutinized since the election, and several irregularities are thought to have favored Bush. These included the notorious Palm Beach "butterfly ballot", which produced an unexpectedly large number of votes for third-party candidate Patrick Buchanan, and a purge of some 50,000 alleged felons from the Florida voting rolls that included many voters who were eligible to vote under Florida law. Some commentators still consider such irregularities and the legal maneuvering around the recounts to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the vote, but as a matter of law the issue was settled when the
United States Congress accepted Florida's electoral delegation. Nonetheless, embarrassment about the Florida vote uncertainties led to widespread calls for electoral reform in the United States, and ultimately to the passage of the
Help America Vote Act, which authorized the
United States federal government to provide funds to the states to replace their mechanical voting equipment with
electronic voting equipment. However, this has led to new controversies, because of the security weaknesses of the computer systems, the lack of paper-based methods of secure verification, and the necessity to rely on the trustworthiness of the manufacturers.
Primaries
\nSee: US presidential primaries of 2000
Overview, and timeline (Election Day and beyond)
\nThe 2000 Presidential election was among the closest elections in the history of the
United States. Other close elections include the elections of
1800 (with a tie in electoral votes),
1876,
1916,
1960,
1968, and
1976.
The results of the
November 7 election were not known for more than a month after the election, because the counting and recounting of Florida presidential ballots, which swung the election, extended for more than a month. The
Florida vote was the closest of all of the states and state law provided for an automatic recount due to the small difference, and there were general concerns about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process, especially since a small change in the vote count could change the result. The final (and disputed) official Florida count gave the victory to Bush by 537 votes.
The Democratic Party lodged a dispute over the state's election results requesting that disputed ballots in three heavily-Democratic counties be counted by hand. During the recounting process, the Bush campaign hired
George H. W. Bush's former
Secretary of State James Baker to oversee the legal process, and the Gore campaign hired
Bill Clinton's former
Secretary of State Warren Christopher. Numerous local court rulings went both ways, some ordering recounts because the vote was so close and others declaring that a selective manual recount in a few heavily-Democratic counties would be unfair. Eventually, the Gore campaign appealed to the Florida Supreme Court in which it was ordered that the recounting process proceed. The Bush campaign subsequently appealed to the
Supreme Court of the United States which took up the case
Bush v. Gore on
December 1. On
December 4, the court nullified the decision of the Florida Supreme Court saying that the court's decision to bypass state election laws, which stated that results had to be certified by a certain date, was dubious at best saying that there was "considerable uncertainty" as to the precise grounds for their ruling.
Early in the afternoon of
December 12, the Republican-dominated Florida House of Representatives voted nearly on party lines to certify the state's electors for Bush. Later that afternoon, the Florida Supreme Court upheld lower court rulings authorizing recounts in several south Florida counties.
All the lower court rulings became moot when around 10pm on
December 12, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down two decisions in favor of Bush, the critical one 7-2 and the other 5-4, effectively ending the election. The court's majority cited differing vote-counting standards from county to county and the lack of a single judicial officer to oversee the recount, both of which, it ruled, violated the
equal protection clause of the
United States Constitution, and so any recount could not be completed in a constitutional manner.
At 9pm on
December 13, in a nationally televised address, Gore conceded that he lost his bid for the presidency. He asks his supporters to support Bush, saying, "This is America, and we put country before party." During his speech, Gore's family and Joe and Hadassah Lieberman stood quietly nearby.
Texas Governor
George W. Bush became President-elect and began forming his transition committee. Bush tried to reach across party lines and bridge a divided America, stating that "the president of the United States is the president of every single American, of every race and every background."
On
January 6,
2001, a joint session of
Congress met to certify the
U.S. Electoral College vote. Although several members of the
House of Representatives filed objections to the electoral votes of Florida, they were ruled out of order because they were not signed by a
Senator.
Bush took the oath of office on
January 20.
The Electoral College vote was so close that a shift from Bush to Gore in almost any state won by Bush would have swung the election to Gore (271 Electoral College votes for Bush and 266 for Gore).
Vice President Al Gore came in second even though he received a larger number of popular votes (Gore got 500,000 more popular votes than Bush) and this contributed to the controversy of the election. This was at least the fourth time that a candidate who did not receive a plurality of the popular vote received a majority of the Electoral College vote, the first time probably being in the
1824 elections although popular vote records do not exist for earlier elections. Until this election, the
1876 elections had been the most contentious in U.S. history. However, it should be pointed out that if the American system were based on the popular vote, rather than the Electoral College, then the turnout of voters would have been different. Voter turnout in states that favor one party heavily tends to be lower. Because of this, the popular vote cannot be used to predict who would have won an actual popular vote election.
Florida election results
\nOn election night, it quickly became clear that Florida would be a contentious state. The national television networks, through information provided them by the Voter News Service, first called Florida for Gore well in advance of the polls closing in the most heavily republican counties, then Bush hours after all the polls had closed (leading to questions about the influence of biased national new media in the election process), then as 'too close to call'. The Voter News Service was an organization backed and supported by television networks and the
Associated Press to help determine the results of presidential elections as early as possible, through early result tallies and exit polling.
Due to the narrow margin of the original vote count, Florida law mandated a statewide recount. In addition, the Gore campaign requested that the votes in 3 counties be recounted by hand, which is within their rights under Florida election law. The Bush campaign then sued in Federal court to stop the hand recounts. This case eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, which ruled 5-4 to stop the vote count, effectively declaring Bush the winner. The Supreme Court also found that the additional recounts requested by Gore to be unconstitutional, in a 7-2 vote.
Final certified vote for the state of Florida (25 electoral votes)\n\n\n| Presidential Candidate | \nVote Total | \nPct | \nParty\n |
\n\n| George W. Bush (W) | \n2,912,790 | \n48.850 | \nRepublican | \n
\n\n| Al Gore | \n2,912,253 | \n48.841 | \nDemocrat | \n
\n\n| Ralph Nader | \n97,421 | \n1.633 | \nGreen | \n
\n\n| Patrick J. Buchanan | \n17,412 | \n0.292 | \nReform | \n
\n\n| Harry Browne | \n16,102 | \n0.270 | \nLibertarian | \n
\n\n| John Hagelin | \n2,274 | \n0.038 | \nNatural Law/Reform | \n
\n\n| Howard Phillips | \n1,378 | \n0.023 | \nConstitution | \n
\n\n| Other | \n3,027 | \n0.051 | \n- | \n
\n\n| Total | \n5,962,657 | \n100.00 | \n | \n
\n| Source: CBS News State Results for Election 2000\n |
|---|
\n
Controversy in Florida
\nFollowing the election a number of studies have been made of the electoral process in Florida by Democrats, Republicans and other interested parties. A number of flaws and improprieties have been discovered in the process. Listed below are the various controversies that have arisen.
- The television news media called the state for Al Gore around 8:48pm EST, while voters in the western panhandle (which is in the Central Time Zone) of the state were still voting, potentially depressing the voter turnout. This region of the state is mostly Republican.
- Jeb Bush, the brother of George W. Bush, was governor of Florida, leading some Gore advocates to make various allegations of impropriety, especially due to their joint campaigning for the Republican vote in Florida and Jeb Bush's assurances to George W. Bush that the Republicans could win Florida. However, it is typical for sitting governors to strongly campaign on behalf of the candidate with the same party affiliation.
- There were a number of overseas ballots missing postmarks or filled out in such a way that they were invalid under Florida law. A poll worker filled out the missing information on some hundred of these ballots. The Democrats moved to have all overseas ballots thrown out because of this. These disputes added to the mass of litigation between parties to influence the counting of ballots. The largest group of disputed overseas ballots were military ballots, which the Republicans argued to have accepted.
- Some 179,855 ballots were not counted in the official tally. These were ballots which were mistakenly filled out, however, in some counties the voting machines (Accuvotes) would return the ballot and allow voters to try again, whilst in other counties the reject mechanisms were not enabled, thus giving voters only one chance to correctly mark the ballot. As a general trend, reject mechanisms were disabled in disproportionately African-American and Hispanic counties.
- A suit by NAACP (NAACP v. Harris) argued that Florida was in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the US Constitution's Equal Protection Amendment. Settlement agreements were reached in this suit. On a related note, Greg Palast provides the following statistics in his book The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, implying a gap in uncounted vote percentages between primarily African American and Caucasian counties. It should be noted, however, that these statistics do not specify that the counties sampled are both listing the highest uncounted vote totals.\n**Uncounted votes in counties with 25%+ African-American Residents: Gadsden (12%); Hamilton (9%); Jackson (7%); Madison (7%)\n**Uncounted votes in counties with 95%+ Caucasian Residents: Citrus (0.5%); Pasco (3%); Santa Rosa (1%); Sarasota (2%)
- 57,700 voters were incorrectly listed as felons on a "scrub list" and thus their votes were not counted. (In some cases, the alleged felonies were dated several years after the election and the vast majority of the listed were not felons.) These persons were disproportionately Democrats of African-American and Hispanic descent. While the story was widely reported from November in countries such as the UK, the US media refused to publish it until many months after the elections(1). However, in balance an additional 8,000 non-felons had been supplied by the state of Texas, via Database Technologies, and these people were added to the list in May 2000. Several months after the election, the Palm Beach Post revealed this story. These 8,000 were later removed from the list following a story by the Palm Beach Post. 714 Illinoisans and 990 Ohioans were added in the same fashion and not removed.
- People like Washington County Elections Chief Carol Griffen (1 p.25), have argued that Florida was in violation of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 by requiring those convicted of felonies in other states (and subsequently restored their rights by said states), to request clemency and a restoration of their rights, from Governor Bush, in a process which might take 2 years and ultimately was left to Bush's discretion. One should note Schlenther v. Florida Department of State (June 1998) which ruled that Florida could not prevent a man convicted of a felony in Connecticut, where his civil rights had not been lost, from exercising his civil rights.
\n
- The result of the Florida U.S. Presidential race was so close that some Democratic Party officials argue that one Florida county's hard-to-use ballot may have unfairly decided the presidency. Critics argue that some voters in Palm Beach County, Fla. might have accidentally voted for Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan, when they thought they were voting for Al Gore, on a so-called "butterfly ballot". The Democrats are listed second in the left column; but punching a hole in the second circle actually cast a vote for Buchanan. Voters who punched this second hole, however, would have ignored a prominent arrow on the ballot showing which hole was to be punched.[1]. The Palm Beach Post's review of the discarded ballots showed that 5,330 votes were cast for Gore and Pat Buchanan, compared with only 1,631 for Bush and Buchanan. In response, others point out that the ballot was designed by a Democrat, Theresa Lapore who would not have chosen party affiliation if the county had not historically chosen Democrats for her position. The ballot was also approved by a representative of both major parties. But neither of these responses go to the issue of whether the ballot may have inadvertently cost Gore the election. Buchanan himself said on the Today show, Nov. 9, 2000, "When I took one look at that ballot on Election Night ... it's very easy for me to see how someone could have voted for me in the belief they voted for Al Gore". Although Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer said on Nov. 9, 2000, "Palm Beach County is a Pat Buchanan stronghold and that's why Pat Buchanan received 3,407 votes there", Buchanan's Florida coordinator, Jim McConnell, responded, "That's nonsense", and Jim Cunningham, chairman of the executive committee of Palm Beach County's Reform Party, responded, "I don't think so. Not from where I'm sitting and what I'm looking at." Cunningham estimated the number of Buchanan supporters in Palm Beach County to be between 400 and 500. Asked how many votes he would guess Buchanan legitimately received in Palm Beach County, he said, "I think 1,000 would be generous. Do I believe that these people inadvertently cast their votes for Pat Buchanan? Yes, I do. We have to believe that based on the vote totals elsewhere." \n
\nSee also: ChoicePoint and Greg Palast
The Florida Ballot Project recounts
\nThe Florida Ballot Project at the University of Chicago, sponsored by a consortium of major U.S. News organizations, conducted a comprehensive review all uncounted ballots in the Florida 2000 presidential election, and reported how different layouts correlate with voter mistakes. Its findings were reported by the media during the week after
November 12 2001. Recounts showed mixed results. Gore would have won any state-wide recount in which all of the ballots were counted. However, Bush would have won a recount if just smaller subsets of ballots were counted. Here is a summary of the NORC recount results performed using different counting standards, as seen in a report by one of the Washington Post journalists who ran the consortium recount.
[1]
\n\n| Candidate Outcomes Based on Potential Recounts in Florida Presidential Election 2000 | \n
\n\n| Review Method | \nWinner | \n
\n\n| Review of All Ballots Statewide (Never Undertaken) | \n | \n
\n| . . . Standard as set by each county Canvassing Board during their survey | \nGore by 171 | \n
\n\n| . . . Fully punched chads and limited marks on optical ballots | \nGore by 115 | \n
\n| . . . Any dimples or optical mark | \nGore by 107 | \n
\n| . . . One corner of chad detached or optical mark | \nGore by 60 | \n
\n\n| Review of Limited Sets of Ballots (Initiated But Never Completed) | \n | \n
\n| . . . Gore request for recounts of all ballots in Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Volusia counties | \nBush by 225 | \n
\n\n| . . . Florida Supreme Court of all undervotes statewide | \nBush by 430 | \n
\n| . . . Florida Supreme Court as being implemented by the counties, some of whom refused and some counted overvotes as well as undervotes | \nBush by 493 | \n
\n\n| Certified Result (Official Final Count) | \n | \n
\n| . . . Recounts included from Volusia and Broward only | \nBush by 537 | \n
\n
Response to the problems
\nSince the Presidential Election was so close and hotly contested in Florida, the U.S. Government and state governments have pushed for election reform, usually consisting of installation of modern
electronic voting machines.
Electronic voting was initially touted by many as a
panacea for the ills faced during the 2000 election. In years following, such machines were questioned for a lack of a redundant paper trail, less than ideal security standards, and low tolerance for software or hardware problems. The U.S. Presidential Election of 2000 began the debate about election and voting reform, but it did not end it.
See Electronic voting: problems.
Minor party candidates
\nThere were five other candidates on the majority of the 51 ballots (50 states plus the District of Columbia):\n
Harry Browne (
Libertarian, 50), \n
Pat Buchanan (
Reform, 49),\n
Ralph Nader (
Green, 44),\n
Howard Phillips (
Constitution, 41),\nand
John Hagelin (
Natural Law, 38).
Nader was the most successful of third party candidates, drawing 2.74% of the popular vote. His campaign was marked by a traveling tour of "super-rallies"; large rallies held in sports arenas like
Madison Square Garden, with filmmaker
Michael Moore as master of ceremonies. After initially ignoring Nader, the Gore campaign made a big publicity pitch to (potential) Nader supporters in the final weeks of the campaign, downplaying Gore's differences with Nader on the issues and claiming that Gore's ideas were more similar to Nader's than Bush's were, noting that Gore had a better chance of winning than Nader. On the other side, the Republican Leadership Council ran pro-Nader ads in a few states in a likely effort to split the "left" vote.
[1] In the aftermath of the campaign, many Gore supporters blamed Nader for drawing enough would-be Gore votes to push Bush over Gore, labeling Nader a
"spoiler" candidate.
Media post-electoral studies/recounts
\nIn 2003, US citizens living in the state of
Florida were asked who they voted for in the 2000 Election as part of the Statistical Abstract Census. The results showed President Bush receiving more than 1000 votes more than former Vice President Gore.
Abstention of D.C. elector
\nOne elector from the District of Columbia,
Barbara Lett-Simmons, abstained from voting in the Electoral College, in
protest of the District's lack of a voting representative in
Congress. D.C. does have a
non-voting delegate to Congress.
See also:
\n*President of the United States\n*
U.S. presidential election\n*
George W. Bush presidential campaign, 2000\n*
Al Gore presidential campaign, 2000\n*
2000\n*
History of the United States (1988-present)\n*
Other close U.S. presidential elections:\n**
1800\n**
1876\n**
1916\n**
1960\n**
1968\n**
1976
References/external links
\n* The Betrayal of America, Vincent Bugliosi (
May 2001)\n*
The Best Democracy Money Can Buy by
Greg Palast (
2002)\n*
Timeline of the 2000 Presidential Election\n*
Presidential Primaries, Caucuses, and Conventions\n*
Selected primary candidates for the election\n*
Report from U.S. Commission on Civil Rights\n*
Top Democratic Party contributors\n*
Top Republican Party contributors\n*
UK Guardian newspaper special report on US 2000 election
zh-cn:2000年美国总统选举\nCategory:U.S. presidential elections
