Warlock
Category:Witchcraft\n
For other meanings of the term, see warlock (disambiguation).
Warlocks are, among historic
Christian traditions, said to be the male equivalent of
witches (usually in the pejorative sense of
Europe's
Middle Ages), and were said to ride pitch-forks (six foot two-tined forks, for manoeuvering unbound hay) instead of broomsticks.
A possible origin
\nHowever, this may be a new meaning, as the frequent use of "warlock" to describe a male witch is largely based on Hollywood\nscriptwriters, especially those writing for the 1960s sitcom, Bewitched1.
Among a few traditions of neo-pagans, a "warlock" is a punishment ceremony, not a person. In the ceremony a person's access to magickal power is "locked" and he or she has no ability to perform effective magickal spells, or have access to the energies at all. This is regarded, by those who believe in it, as one of the most severe punishments that can be meted out among the neo-pagan community.
Many neo-pagans consider the word an insult, probably because of its etymology. The word itself comes from a Scottish word meaning "oathbreaker" or "liar"2. However, one source suggests that the word may come from the Old Norse Vard-lokkur, "caller of spirits".
Another possible origin
\nThere is another, folk-etymology version for the origin of the word warlock, coming from Old English 'wær-loga', the man of the logs, alluding to the small pieces of wood the Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian priests and wise men used to divine by means of the runes. This seems to have been a slang word of Christian coinage pejoratively used on those who remained Pagan and practising the art of the runes. By extension, it became a synonym of sorcerer and wizard, and also of a typical medieval diabolical male witch (in this sense either able to fly in several ways, see Sabbath, witchcraft). The use of the word witch to name both witch and warlock is turning the word into an archaic one.
References
\n1: Pavlac, Brian A. "10 Common Errors and Myths about the Witch Hunts, Corrected and Commented," Prof. Pavlac's Women's History Resource Site. (October 31, 2001) [1] (October 8, 2003).