Year 2000 problemThe Year 2000 Problem (also known as the Y2K problem and the millennium bug) was a flaw in computer program design that caused some\ndate-related processing to operate incorrectly for dates and times on and after January 1, 2000. It turned into a major fear that critical industries (electricity, financial, etc.) and government functions would stop working at 12:00 AM, January 1, 2000 and at other critical dates which were billed as "event horizons." This fear was fueled by huge amounts of press coverage and speculation, as well as copious official corporate and government reports. In the end, few Y2K errors were encountered on Jan 1, 2000, although the preparation for it had a significant effect on the computer industry.
Public reaction to the problemSome industries started experiencing related problems early in the 1990s as software began to process future dates past 1999.\nFor example, in 1993, some people with financial loans that were due in 2000 received (incorrect) notices that they were 93 years past due.\nAs the decade progressed, more and more companies experienced problems and lost money due to erroneous date data.\nAs another example, meat-processing companies incorrectly destroyed large amounts of good meat because the computerized inventory system identified the meat as expired.\nThere were, in fact, many such minor "horror stories" like these, which received much play in the press as 2000 approached. As the decade progressed, identifying and correcting or replacing affected computer systems or computerized devices became the major focus of information technology departments in most large companies and organizations.\nMillions of lines of programming code were reviewed and fixed during this period.\nMany corporations replaced major software systems with completely new ones that did not have the date processing problems.\nIt was frequently reported that corporations had already experienced at least minor Y2K problems, and some major problems as well, due to date look-ahead functions in code and embedded systems, but it was and still is not clear what the full cost and seriousness of these problems were. Y2K was the big media hype story of 1999. Public apprehension was tremendous, reaching, in some quarters, enormous proportions.\nSome individuals stockpiled canned or dried food in anticipation of food shortages. A few commentators predicted a full-scale apocalypse--three of the best known were computer consultant Edward Yourdon, religious commentator Gary North, and economist Edward Yardeni.What actually happenedBefore the year 2000\nThere were a number of minor problems that occurred even before the beginning of the year 2000. One such example was a supermarket chain in the midwestern United States. When a cash register encountered a credit card that had an expiration date that was after the year 2000, it created a serious error in the computer systems running the cash register. The error caused the computer system to shut down all the cash registers throughout the entire supermarket chain. This was used by experts to illustrate the need for businesses to study whether or not a Y2K bug could cripple them as well.After the beginning of the year 2000\nWhen January 1, 2000 finally came, there were few major problems reported, contrary to many expectations. They mostly occurred in countries with less experience with computers, and/or less money to address the problem. A few made the news, such as a nuclear power plant in Japan that shut down for a short while due to a problem in an auxiliary system. But in most cases, the problems encountered were minor and were fixed by programmers without difficulty. Ironically, many people were upset that there appeared to be so much hype over nothing, because the vast majority of problems had been fixed correctly.\nSome critics have suggested that much preventive effort was unnecessary -- it would have been cheaper not to spend as much examining non-critical systems for flaws and simply fix the few that would have failed after the event. Others say that had it not been for such efforts, the problem would have been much more worse and widespread. For those not involved in the preventive effort, such conclusions were easy to draw, as they had no knowledge of the countless systems that had been corrected, but had only witnessed the problems that had not been fixed in time. Few of them realized that fixing the problems afterwards would have been much harder as active millennium problems would have complicated matters. But in any case, for many systems the checking procedure involved replacement with new, improved functionality and thus in many cases the expenditure proved useful regardless. Preparing for Y2K resulted in many more computer programming and testing jobs than would have otherwise existed. Programs were reviewed and tested that otherwise would have been considered "done".Items of interest\n* The United States established the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act, which limited the liability of businesses who had properly disclosed their Y2K readiness.\n* Insurance companies sold insurance policies covering failure of businesses due to Y2K problems.\n* Attorneys organized and mobilized for Y2K class action lawsuits (which were not pursued).\n* No major failures of infrastructure were reported in the United States or even in many places where they had been widely expected, such as Russia.\n* The Y2K problem mainly affected countries that follow the western calendar (Saudi Arabia, for example, does not).\n* One theory has it that the Federal Reserve increased the money supply in 1999 to compensate for anticipated hoarding by a frightened populace. The populace, however, was not frightened, and the flood of new money fueled a stock market high tide that went out in spring of 2000.\n* Many organisations finally realised the critical importance of their IT infrastructure to their business, and put in place plans to keep it running and restore capability in case of disaster. Such planning may well have helped the relatively speedy return to functioning of New York's critical financial IT systems after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack.\n* Speculatively, the Y2K spending on information infrastructure caused a slowdown in information technology spending in the year 2000 and 2001 and may eventually lead to higher productivity in future years.\n* The Long Now Foundation, which (in their words) "seeks to promote 'slower/better' thinking and to foster creativity in the framework of the next 10,000 years", has a policy of anticipating the Year 10,000 problem by writing all years with five digits. For example, they list "01996" as their year of founding. \n* One of the founders of the Long Now Foundation, Danny Hillis, was one of the few commentators who publicly predicted that Y2K bugs would cause no significant problems (see "Why Do We Buy the Myth of Y2K?", Newsweek, May 31, 1999).\n* Univision news reported that on the evening of December 31, 1999, a couple in Peru had committed suicide, for fears of what Y2K would bring.Quote\n*"We may not have got everything right, but at least we knew the century was going to end."–Parodic science fiction author Douglas Adams, in an advertisement for Apple Macintosh personal computers. References\n*DeJesus, Edmund X. (1998). "Year 2000 Survival Guide." BYTE magazine, July 1998, vol. 23, no. 7 (the last issue of BYTE)External links\n*"A Day in the Hype of America" – Y2K documentary Category:System software\nCategory:Calendars zh-cn:两千年问题 |
||||
"Well-timed silence hath more eloquence than speech." - Martin Fraquhar Tupper |
